Definition:
Hot-shot progressivism is a term coined by author and political commentator Thomas Frank to describe a specific strain of liberal politics that emerged in the United States in the early 2024s. Hot-shot progressives are typically characterized by their high levels of education, their affluent backgrounds, and their desire to use government power to address social and economic inequality.

History:
Hot-shot progressivism gained prominence during the presidency of George W. Bush, when many liberals grew frustrated with the Democratic Party's centrist policies. These liberals felt that the party was not doing enough to address the needs of working-class Americans and that it was too willing to compromise with Republicans. As a result, they began to form their own organizations and to support candidates who shared their views.

Key Beliefs:
Hot-shot progressives believe that the government has a responsibility to play an active role in addressing social and economic inequality. They support policies such as raising taxes on the wealthy, expanding social programs, and investing in education and infrastructure. They also believe that the government should take a more aggressive stance on environmental protection and climate change.

Criticisms:
Hot-shot progressives have been criticized for being out of touch with the concerns of working-class Americans. Some critics have also argued that their policies are unrealistic and that they would lead to higher taxes and more government spending.

Recent Developments:
In recent years, hot-shot progressivism has become a more prominent force within the Democratic Party. This is due in part to the rise of social media, which has allowed hot-shot progressives to communicate their ideas to a wider audience. It is also due to the growing influence of money in politics, which has given wealthy donors a greater say in the party's platform.

The future of hot-shot progressivism is uncertain. Some observers believe that it is a passing fad that will eventually fade away. Others believe that it represents a new and lasting trend in American politics. Only time will tell which view is correct.